Ts 990s vs ic 7800 software#
For example since the release of version 2 software for the Flex they added SmartLink which makes remote operating very easy. The SDR radios such as Flex, Anan, and SunSDR have the ability to add new features easily. People commented the 3D panadapter display is almost useless. Excellent receiver performance but poor ergonomics if you read the reviews on eHam and other sites. The FTdx-101D is a hybrid design using roofing filters to enhance receiver performance. But the 7300 remains one of the best bang for the buck in HF radios. I haven't seen what I consider major features added to those radios but refinements and bug fixes.Ĭomposite TX noise on the 7300 is quite bad. They leverage direct sampling receiver technology but I doubt Icom or Yaesu would release a software package adding new and innovative features. The 73 are not as easy to add new features. While the FTdx-101D is fairly new things may change. The 7300, 7610, and FTdx-101D fall into a kind of weird category. What do you want on your desk? How do you plan to operate? Is remote operation important? Some radios are easier to run multiple programs simultaneously (logging, digital, etc). Pretty much receive on most of the radios mentioned above will be fine on almost all QTHs as the reeivers are environmentally noise limited.
The best thing you can do is to find other hams local to you that have the model of radios you are considering.
0 kommentar(er)
